Is harder better?

As I'm browsing the internet for latest and greatest I can't help but wonder why they make it look so complex. They stand on one leg on top of a Bosu ball while trying to juggle some balls. Who do they think is going to do that, and what does it really do for you? I like to change things so that people don't get bored, but sticking to the basic is still the best. There is an endless variety of simple (doable) exercises that are challenging enough for most people. I always try the exercises before I have other people do them. The general rule of thumb is: "if I can't do it, they can't either". Exercises do not have to be complicated for them to be effective or even good. As well, a workout doesn't have to "kill" you for it to be called "great." I've seen trainers and workout sessions where the clients are clearly so not able to do the exercises, not because of fitness inadequacy but more because the trainer has thrown way too much in. Good form fails, more risk of injury vs good results.

A few years back, when Rowe was working for one of the big corporations that could afford onsite gyms/trainers, she decided she'd add in a "bootcamp" workout during lunch. Now, my wife knows a thing or two about exercise and fitness. So, when this bootcamp class started having the participants do a full hour of sprinting (on concrete at that) back and forth, she immediately knew...this is crap. Why would a trainer assume that clients would know how to sprint! I'm all for explosive exercises, but not for everyone and not the first time out! Always assess people before the workout. Find out what kind of background they have, and what fitness level they are at. Make it simple, doable and realistic (meaning less risk for injury) for the person. It can be built up (safely) vs getting them injured (it would just be a matter of time). That's how you get the best results.